The NYT doesn't like the 4-3 conservative majority on the Wisconsin Supreme Court.

It has a solution, wrapped up in the pretense of restoring ethics and taking the money and politics out of judging.

Members of Wisconsin’s top court need to focus on restoring civility and public trust... They should... adopt an appeals process for recusals, so the final decision is no longer left to the judge whose impartiality is being questioned. The court’s credibility, and justice in Wisconsin, are on the line.

What are the chances the NYT would propose that if the 4-3 balance favored liberals?